Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program

Skip Navigation

Javier I. García*, Luis Noriega-Portella and Luis Noriega-Hoces

Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, PRANOR Group of Assisted Reproduction, Concebir Clinic, Los Olivos 364, San Isidro, Lima, Peru *Correspondence address. Tel: +51-1-422-5246; E-mail: jgarciaf{at}hotmail.comReceived May 18, 2010. Revision received November 29, 2010. Accepted January 7, 2011. BACKGROUND A successful oocyte vitrification program is important for women with various indications for assisted reproduction technology. The objective of this study was to report the outcome of vitrification of oocytes, obtained through an oocyte donation program, by evaluating the embryo development, pregnancy and implantation rates (IRs) after blastocyst transfer.

METHODS A total of 1098 oocytes were obtained from 78 donors. There were 312 oocytes used in the study group (vitrified oocytes) and 786 used in the control group (fresh oocytes). There were 34 recipients who received blastocysts obtained from vitrified oocytes and 58 recipients who received blastocysts from fresh oocytes. The fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality, pregnancy rate (PR) and IR were compared between groups.

RESULTS Vitrified oocytes showed a survival rate of 89.4%. There was no difference in the fertilization rate (76.1 and 87.5%), Day 2 cleavage rate (96.3 and 98.0%) or blastocyst formation rate (41.3 and 45.3%) for the study and control groups, respectively. PRs, IRs and miscarriages rates (MRs) were similar for the study group compared with the control group (PR: 61.8 versus 60.0%; IR: 43.9 versus 42.9%; MR: 9.5 versus 5.9%).

CONCLUSIONS The developmental competence of embryos obtained from vitrified oocytes is not affected by the vitrification procedure, since they preserve the potential to be fertilized and to develop into high-quality blastocysts, similar to embryos from fresh oocytes. The successful clinical outcome indicates the use of this procedure for oocyte donation programs and for oocyte storage in general.

© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This ArticleHum. Reprod. (2011) 26 (4): 782-790. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der008 First published online: February 7, 2011

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Peliculas Online

Read More..

Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer

Skip Navigation

F. Guerif1,2,3,4,*, C. Frapsauce1,2,3,4, C. Chavez1, V. Cadoret1,2,3,4 and D. Royere1,2,3,4

1Service de Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU de Tours, F-37044 Tours, France

2Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37041 Tours, France

3INRA, UMR85 PRC, F-37380 Nouzilly, France

4CNRS, UMR6175 PRC, F-37380 Nouzilly, France *Correspondence address. Service de Medecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, 2 boulevard Tonnelle, 37000 Tours, France. E-mail: guerif{at}med.univ-tours.frReceived November 17, 2010. Revision received January 4, 2011. Accepted January 11, 2011. BACKGROUND Embryologists currently face a challenge when counselling patients regarding the stage and the number of embryos to transfer when no top-quality embryos (TQE) are available.

METHODS The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of single blastocyst transfer (SBT) in comparison with the transfer of two cleavage-stage embryos in women under 36 years old. A total of 450 women under 36 years undergoing their first or second IVF treatment who had no TQE on Day 2 were included in this prospective study. Couples were assigned to either a SBT or a double cleavage-stage embryo transfer (DET). The clinical end-points monitored were rates of implantation, delivery and multiple deliveries.

RESULTS The rate of transfer was significantly lower for couples assigned to the SBT group compared with the DET group (88 versus 100%, respectively, P < 0.001) while the delivery rate per oocyte retrieval was similar in both groups (26.7%). By contrast, the rate of multiple deliveries was significantly lower in the SBT group compared with the DET group (3.3 versus 23.3%, respectively, P < 0.01). Blastocyst cryopreservation was twice as high in the SBT group compared with the DET group (39 versus 18%, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS These findings show the value of extended embryo culture for couples without TQE. In such situations, delaying embryo transfer in order to select a single blastocyst with the highest potential for implantation can reduce the number of multiple pregnancies. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that extended culture allows blastocyst cryopreservation from embryos not available for Day 2 cryopreservation.

© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This ArticleHum. Reprod. (2011) 26 (4): 775-781. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der020 First published online: February 9, 2011

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Peliculas Online

Read More..